Category: FMLA


Understanding the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Your Rights

By ,

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Can Protect Your Work Rights.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a federal law that provides eligible employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year for specific family or medical reasons.

FMLA leave can be taken in various scenarios, including:

  • The birth of a child and bonding with the newborn within one year of birth.
  • The placement of a child for adoption or foster care and connecting with the child within one year of placement.
  • To care for a spouse, child, or parent with a severe health condition.
  • A serious health condition that prevents the employee from performing their job.
  • Any qualifying exigency arising out of a spouse, child, or parent being on covered active duty or called to covered active duty in the Armed Forces.

In addition, the FMLA provides eligible employees with up to 26 weeks of leave in a single 12-month period to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness if the employee is the servicemember’s spouse, child, parent, or next of kin.

How Much FMLA Leave Is Available?

Eligible employees are entitled to up to 12 work weeks of FMLA leave in 12 months. To qualify, you must:

  • Work for a covered employer: private-sector employers with 50 or more employees, public agencies, and public or private elementary and secondary schools.
  • Have worked for the employer for at least 12 months (not necessarily consecutive).
  • Have worked at least 1,250 hours during the 12 months immediately preceding the start of the leave.
  • Work at a location where the employer has at least 50 employees within a 75-mile radius.

What Conditions Qualify for FMLA Leave?

A qualifying serious health condition is an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves:

  • Inpatient care in a hospital, hospice, or residential medical care facility.
  • Incapacity for more than three full, consecutive calendar days with continuing treatment by a health care provider.
  • Chronic conditions requiring periodic treatment by a health care provider, continuing over an extended period, and causing episodic incapacity.
  • Permanent or long-term conditions requiring supervision by a health care provider.
  • Conditions requiring multiple treatments by a health care provider for restorative surgery after an accident or other injury or for a condition that would likely result in incapacity of more than three consecutive days if left untreated.

How to Apply for FMLA Leave?

To request FMLA leave, you should follow these steps:

  • Notify your employer as soon as you know the need for leave. If the need is foreseeable, provide at least 30 days’ notice. If not, notify your employer as soon as possible (typically within one to two business days of learning about the need for leave).
  • Comply with your employer’s usual and customary notice and procedural requirements for requesting leave.
  • Provide sufficient information for your employer to determine whether the FMLA applies to the leave request, such as the anticipated timing and duration of the leave and relevant facts about the reason for the leave.
  • If requested, provide appropriate documentation, such as a certification from a health care provider, to support the need for leave.

Many federal laws protect your rights at work, including the FMLA. Understanding these laws is challenging, and if you think your rights have been violated, speak with an employment lawyer.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Can Protect Your Work Rights

If your work rights have been violated, speak with our Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. to discuss your options. Call us at 215-574-0600 or contact us online to schedule a consultation. Located in Philadelphia, we serve clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Employment Law, FMLA
  Comments: Comments Off on Understanding the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Your Rights
  Other posts by

HUP Employee Fired While Recovering from Breast Cancer Treatment

By ,

Philadelphia business lawyers assist clients with employment disputes.The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania has a reputation for being a leading breast cancer treatment center. When an anesthesiology technician who worked at the hospital was diagnosed with breast cancer, she knew that she was in good hands, and that she would receive excellent treatment, which she did. Unfortunately, while the employee was still undergoing chemotherapy and radiation, she was fired from her job, which caused her and her family significant financial hardship and stress.

A mammogram and biopsy confirmed the cancer after the plaintiff found a lump in her breast. Doctors performed a lumpectomy and checked to see if the cancer had spread into the lymph nodes, which it had. As a result, she had to undergo more aggressive treatment, including a mastectomy followed by 16 weeks of weekly chemotherapy, then six weeks of daily radiation. She was able to take a four-month medical leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act so that she could rest and recover from the side effects of treatment.

Plaintiff Fired After Second Request for Medical Leave

After the initial extension of her medical leave, her doctors requested a second extension due to the physical effects of the radiation, including burns, tight skin, and open wounds. The hospital’s Office of Disability Management replied to the request, saying that her department supervisor would determine whether accommodations should be made that would not impose an undue hardship. However, instead of receiving an accommodation, the plaintiff received a termination letter in the mail following a series of unpleasant phone conversations with a representative from the hospital’s personnel department.

According to the plaintiff, at no point did anyone at the hospital ever give any indication that her job was in jeopardy. She had to move in with her mother after exhausting her disability and unemployment benefits, and is now working as a classroom aide in a local school. She filed a lawsuit against the hospital and is seeking financial compensation for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The hospital has since filled her position, and the new hire’s start date was the same day the plaintiff would have returned to work if the second request for a leave of absence had been approved.

Philadelphia Business Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Assist Clients with Employment Disputes

If your employment was unfairly terminated or your legal rights were compromised in any way, you are urged to contact the Philadelphia business lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. We will conduct a thorough investigation into your case, and the circumstances surrounding your termination. If we determine that your legal rights were violated, we will seek the financial compensation you deserve. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Our offices are located in Philadelphia, where we serve clients throughout Southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Business Law, FMLA
  Comments: Comments Off on HUP Employee Fired While Recovering from Breast Cancer Treatment
  Other posts by

Court Rules in Favor of Temple University Hospital in FMLA Case

By ,

Philadelphia employment lawyers help clients with employment disputes.Under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), an employer may not harass an employee if he or she needs to take time off to care for a family member. In the case of Hernandez v. Temple University Hospital, the plaintiff claimed that her supervisor violated the FMLA by harassing her for taking frequent days off from work to take care for her daughter, who suffered from asthma. However, regardless of the perceived hostility that the plaintiff felt from her supervisor, all of her requested days off were approved. Ultimately, the plaintiff’s employment was terminated when it was discovered that she violated Temple’s HIPAA policy.

The plaintiff worked as a medical secretary in the hospital’s cardiology department from July 2008 until September 2016. Over the course of her employment, she made numerous requests for time off, including a request for two to three absences per month of up to four hours per episode. Each of these requests were approved. In July 2016, she submitted another request involving more frequent time off in order to take her daughter to multiple medical appointments. While the request for leave was granted, the plaintiff claimed that her supervisor told her that she had to recertify her eligibility for FMLA leave.

The plaintiff went on to say that her supervisor harassed her and questioned the seriousness of her daughter’s illness. She also testified that her supervisor was hostile towards her and increased her workload every time she returned to work after taking leave. The plaintiff argued that her supervisor’s actions violated the FMLA by interfering with her attempt to exercise her rights. In addition, she claimed that her supervisor’s hostility caused her to suffer from extreme stress every time she needed to request time off.

All Requests for Leave Granted

Considering the plaintiff was able to take all the time off that she needed in order to care for her daughter, the Court found that she was unable to prove that she was denied benefits that she was entitled to under the FMLA. In order for the claim to be viable, the plaintiff needed to show that her FMLA rights were withheld, or that her employment was jeopardized by taking leave. The court ruled that the plaintiff did not satisfy the fifth prong of the interference analysis. As a result, she failed to make a prima facie showing of interference.

Ultimately, the plaintiff was terminated because she looked at the medical records of an OB-GYN patient, which is a violation of Temple’s HIPAA policy. The investigation did not involve the plaintiff’s supervisor, who is the only other person to have allegedly been hostile toward the plaintiff. Computer records proved that the plaintiff had, in fact, reviewed the patient’s records, which resulted in her termination.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Help Clients with Employment Disputes

If your legal rights have been compromised at work, the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. will address all of your questions and concerns and seek the maximum financial compensation you deserve. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Our offices are located in Philadelphia, where we serve clients throughout Southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Employment Law, FMLA
  Comments: Comments Off on Court Rules in Favor of Temple University Hospital in FMLA Case
  Other posts by

Former Manager Fails to Show That Her Former Employer’s Reasons for Termination Were Based on Any Discriminatory Motive

By ,

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Ferraro v. Temple University held that Plaintiff failed to show that the legitimate reasons for employee’s termination were pretext for any discriminatory motive. 185 A.3d 396 (Pa. Super. 2018). Plaintiff worked as a manager of patient accounting and was fired at the age of sixty-two for violating another, much younger, employee’s FMLA rights and issuing the same employee an improper citation.

In order to succeed under a claim for age discrimination, Plaintiff had to establish: (1) she belonged to a protected class (at least 40 years old); (2) was qualified for the position; (3) was dismissed despite being qualified; and (4) suffered dismissal under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. Plaintiff argues that the younger employee was given preferential treatment and that she was terminated because of her age. The Court agreed that Plaintiff had established the four elements for age discrimination, but nonetheless ruled in favor of Temple because Plaintiff failed to establish that Temple had terminated her due to her age and not for any other legitimate reason such as her leaving work early to care for her young child. Plaintiff, although the trial court did not find Temple’s reasons credible, did not prove the termination was done in a discriminatory manner.

For more information, call our employment lawyers in Philadelphia at 215-574-0600 or contact us onlineThe legal team at the Law Offices of Sidkoff, Pincus & Green represents clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Age Discrimination, Employment Law, FMLA
  Comments: Comments Off on Former Manager Fails to Show That Her Former Employer’s Reasons for Termination Were Based on Any Discriminatory Motive
  Other posts by