Employers Cannot Use Salary History to Justify Lower Pay for Women

By ,

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard a case from Fresno County, California regarding lower pay for women during an en banc session. The Court concluded in February 2020 that lower pay for women cannot be justified based on their previous pay.

How May Employers Determine Employee Pay?

Under the Equal Pay Act, employers are only allowed to determine employee pay based on four factors:

  • An established seniority system
  • An established merit system
  • A system that measures salary based on quantity or quality
  • Any factor other than sex

Fresno County Schools had a seniority system and a merit system. However, the Court determined the county applied that system improperly under the Equal Pay Act.

What was the Decision?

The Ninth Circuit Court determined that previous pay from a different job cannot fall under the last catch-all “factor other than sex” because the factor’s must be job-related. The case involved a math consultant with the school system who inadvertently discovered she was making less than her male colleagues. The school system used her previous salary, added five percent, and placed her on the corresponding section of the pay scale. She received an extra $600 for her master’s degree, but her salary was calculated based on an entirely different job.

How Does the Ruling Apply to Your Business?

The Ninth Circuit Court noted that other federal courts have come to inconsistent rulings. Regardless, this case has value wherever your employer is located. As a result, employers must be careful that if there is any pay discrepancy between employees, it’s based on job-related reasons.

Philadelphia Business Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Represent Employers and Employees Concerned About Equal Pay

Our Philadelphia business and employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. will work with you on any equal pay case. Contact us online or call us at 215-574-0600 for an initial consultation. Located in Philadelphia, we serve clients throughout Pennsylvania and South Jersey.

  Category: Discrimination, Employment
  Comments: Comments Off on Employers Cannot Use Salary History to Justify Lower Pay for Women
  Other posts by

Small Businesses are Eligible for up to $2 Million in Loans through the Small Business Administration’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program

By ,

The Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program (“EIDL”) is a Small Business Administration (“SBA”) program that operates directly through the SBA. Small businesses, those with five hundred employees or less, must show that it is affected by a disaster, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to qualify for loans.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), passed by Congress and enacted into law on March 27, 2020, expanded the EIDL Program by allowing small businesses to take out loans of up to $200,000 without having to put up collateral or make a personal guarantee. Additionally, the CARES Act established an emergency grant to allow eligible small businesses that have applied for an EIDL to request an advance on the loan of up to $10,000. Even if the business is ultimately denied an EIDL, it will not be required to repay the advance payment. Although small businesses are generally not restricted on how they use an EIDL, the cash advance must be used for specific purposes, such as to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other related bills.

Small businesses can receive an EIDL loan of up to $2 million, however, loan terms, including a determination of the loan amount, are made on a case-by-case basis based on an evaluation of the applicant’s financial information and each borrower’s capacity for making monthly loan repayments. The interest rate on the loan is 3.75% for 30 years. Further, applicants must have a credit history acceptable to the SBA in order to qualify for an EIDL.

Unlike the Payroll Protection Program under the CARES Act, EIDLs are not forgivable, and any loans above $200,000 require collateral or a personal guarantee.

Philadelphia Business Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Provide Guidance to Businesses Seeking Loans through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program.

If you own a small business, and have questions concerning the CARES Act and applying for a loan through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program, you are urged to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Our offices are located in Philadelphia, where we represent clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Coronavirus
  Comments: Comments Off on Small Businesses are Eligible for up to $2 Million in Loans through the Small Business Administration’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program
  Other posts by

$350 Billion in Forgivable Loans Available to Small Business Owners Through the Paycheck Protection Program

By ,

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), was passed by Congress and enacted into law. The CARES Act makes loans available to small businesses with fewer than 500 employees, select types of businesses with fewer than 1,500 employees, 501(c)(3) non-profits with fewer than 500 workers and some 501(c)(19) veteran organizations.  As long as the business was in operation on February 15, 2020, it can obtain a loan.

One type of loan available to small business through the CARES Act is through the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). The PPP sets aside $350 Billion in 100% government-backed loans which are Small Business Administration (“SBA”) guaranteed taken from 1800 SBA approved lenders that can accept applications for these loans. Currently, businesses must apply for a PPP loan through a bank with which they have a relationship. That means the business must seek the forgivable loan through a bank that it has a banking relationship, or it must quickly convince a bank to accept it as a customer. The business may need help if it does not have an already viable relationship as a customer of a bank because banks are being swamped with applications for the forgivable loans from their long-time customers, and are not eager to add to their workload with strangers that want to become customers solely for the purposes of obtaining the forgivable loan.  However, in some instances if a bank has a relationship with a law firm, it can convince the bank to accept a client and a new customer. In those instances, the client would open a bank account, and then the bank processes the application for that business to obtain a forgivable loan.

The maximum loan amount under the PPP is $10 million, with an interest rate no higher than 1% and a maximum payback period of 2 years. Unlike other SBA loans, no collateral or personal guarantees are required. The purpose of a PPP loan is for a small business to cover payroll expenses and not have to terminate its employees. Payroll costs are capped at $100,000 per year per employee.

If the business takes out a loan, and it continues to pay its employees at their normal levels during an eight week period after the loan is originated, the amount spent on payroll costs, which includes health insurance costs, state or local taxes assessed on employee compensation, mortgage interest payments, and rent and utility payments, the amount of the loan can be forgiven. No more than 25% of the forgiven amount may be for non-payroll costs. For any portion of a loan that is not forgiven, interest payments are deferred for six months.

Starting April 3, 2020, small business and sole proprietorships can apply to receive loans to cover their payroll and other covered expenses through existing SBA lenders. Independent contractors and self-employed individuals can apply for a loan starting on April 10, 2020.

Philadelphia Business Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Provide Guidance to Businesses Seeking Loans through the Paycheck Protection Program.

If you own a small business, and have questions concerning the CARES Act and applying for a loan through the Paycheck Protection Program, you are urged to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Our offices are located in Philadelphia, where we represent clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Coronavirus
  Comments: Comments Off on $350 Billion in Forgivable Loans Available to Small Business Owners Through the Paycheck Protection Program
  Other posts by

Congress Passes Families First Coronavirus Response Act

By ,

Creating New Rights for Employees and Requirements for Employers of Small Businesses

On March 18, 2020, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“Act”) was signed into law, requiring employers of businesses with less than 500 employees to provide their employees with paid sick leave or expanded family and medical leave for specified reasons related to COVID-19. Private employers with fewer than 50 employees are exempt when “the imposition of such requirements would jeopardize the viability of the business as a going concern.” The law went into effect on April 1, 2020, and is effective until December 31, 2020.

The Act is comprised of two parts, the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act and the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act. Employers are required to provide notice to their employees of their rights under the Act and may do so by emailing the Notice provided by the Department of Labor to their employees. A copy of the Department of Labor’s Notice can be found at https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/posters/FFCRA_Poster_WH1422_Non-Federal.pdf.

The Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act

Employees of covered employers are entitled to up to two weeks (80 hours) of paid sick leave at their regular rate of pay, up to $511 daily and $5110 total if they are subject to a Federal, State, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19, have been advised by their doctor to self-quarantine, or are experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and are seeking a medical diagnosis.

Employees of covered employees are entitled to up to two weeks (80 hours) of paid sick leave at 2/3 their salary, up to $200 daily and $2000 total, if they are caring for an individual subject to a quarantine order or is self-quarantined, is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed due to COVID-19, or is experiencing any other substantially similar condition specified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Part-time employees are entitled to paid sick leave for the number of hours that the employee normally works over the two-week period.

Lastly, employers cannot require their employees to find a replacement employee for missed time, require the employee to use other paid leave pursuant to policy or law before the employee can use paid sick leave, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against the employee for taking leave, filing a complaint, or testifying in a proceeding.

Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act

Employees of covered employers, who have worked for at least thirty days, are eligible for up to 12 weeks of paid leave at 2/3 of their salary, or up to $200 daily and $12,000 total if they are caring for a child under the age of 18 due to a COVID-19 related declared public health emergence and the child’s school or place of care has been closed or the child’s care provider is unavailable.

The first ten days of family leave are unpaid, but the employee may use paid sick leave if he/she qualifies, and can use other PTO if available.

Employers are required to return an employee who has taken family and medical leave to work in the same or a substantially similar position.

Employers with fewer than 25 employees are exempt if the employee’s position no longer exists dues to economic conditions caused by COVID-19, the employer takes reasonable efforts to restore the employee to an equivalent position, and if there is no equivalent position, the employer takes reasonable efforts over the next year to contact the employee if an equivalent position becomes available.

Employers Entitled to Tax Credits to Pay for Paid Sick and Family Leave

Under the Act, employers may receive tax credits up to the maximum amounts that they must pay their employees for paid sick and family leave. Payroll taxes that are available for retention include withholding federal income taxes, the employee’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes, and the employer’s share of Social Security and Medicare taxes with respect to all employees. If the amount of taxes retained does not cover the costs of their employees’ qualified leave, the IRS will allow employers to seek an expedited advance.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Handle Cases Involving the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

If you are an employee or employer who has questions or concerns relating to your rights and obligations under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, you are urged to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. We handle a wide range of employment issues, including paid sick and family leave. To schedule a confidential consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Our offices are located in Philadelphia, where we represent clients in South Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.

  Category: Coronavirus
  Comments: Comments Off on Congress Passes Families First Coronavirus Response Act
  Other posts by

Philadelphia Expands Its Paid Sick Leave Law to Fight COVID-19 Layoffs/Terminations

By ,

Philadelphia’s paid sick leave law, which was enacted five years ago, requires employers with at least 10 employees to provide one hour of paid sick leave for every 40 hours worked, up to 40 hours per year (or five days).

On March 16, 2020, Philadelphia decided to expand this law to include workers who may be affected by the COVID-19 health crisis. The main highlight of the city’s expansion of its paid sick leave law requires employers to pay out any accrued sick leave time when employees are terminated or laid off. This means any employee who was terminated or laid off on March 16th or anytime after is entitled to receive their accrued paid sick time. The city has already made it known that financial hardship is not a valid reason to break the law.

If you believe your employer has violated this law, the first step is to file a complaint with the city, who will then initiate an investigation. Unfortunately, this investigation could take weeks, or even months, as the number of employees who are terminated increase as a result of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus pandemic. Once the city completes its investigation and reaches a final decision or 180 days passes from the filing of the complaint with no final decision by the city, then an individual will have the right to file a lawsuit against the employer.

If you were terminated as a result of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus pandemic and not paid your accrued paid sick time, please contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. as soon as possible. Our skilled legal team will protect your rights and secure the financial compensation you deserve. To schedule an initial consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online.

  Category: Employment, Employment Law
  Comments: Comments Off on Philadelphia Expands Its Paid Sick Leave Law to Fight COVID-19 Layoffs/Terminations
  Other posts by

FMLA and COVID-19

By ,

With all the uncertainties stemming from COVID-19, it is essential for employers to understand their rights and the rights of their employees under federal laws such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Making informed decisions now can help to mitigate possible issues later.

Under the FMLA, eligible employees who are sick or who are taking care of a sick family member may be entitled to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid job-protected leave. Does this include employees suffering from COVID-19 and their family members? What about those employees seeking to stay home pursuant to the FMLA in order to avoid getting COVID-19 or those who need to stay home with children dismissed from school?

While businesses want to help do their part in supporting our communities during this time, the attorneys at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green, P.C., understand the tough questions posed by COVID-19 and are here to guide businesses through these uncertain times. Allow us the help you navigate the law so that your business can make informed decisions and respond appropriately.

Our experienced employment attorneys are available to help employers act immediately in a manner that complies with federal, state and municipal laws.

Do not hesitate to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Fill out our online form or call us at 215-574-0600. Located in Philadelphia, we provide skilled counsel to clients throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Employers Face Legal Questions During Coronavirus Outbreak

By ,

Thousands of employers in the Philadelphia area have been severely impacted by government restrictions imposed to curb the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). Some large corporations, such as Amazon, are offering paid sick leave to employees diagnosed or quarantined with COVID-19. Other businesses have been forced to close temporarily. Workers are being sent home and employers are left with unprecedented legal questions, including the following:

  • Am I responsible for sending sick workers home?
  • Do my employees have the right to work from home or take off from work if they are concerned about exposure to COVID-19?
  • Am I obligated to offer extended sick leave to employees who have been quarantined?
  • Does the Americans with Disabilities Act provide protections to workers diagnosed with COVID-19?

Our experienced employment attorneys are available to help employers act immediately in a manner that complies with federal, state and municipal laws.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Answer Your Legal Questions Regarding the Coronavirus

Many employers in the Philadelphia area are experiencing unanticipated impacts from the spread of COVID-19. If you have any legal questions regarding your responsibilities as an employer with respect to temporary sick leave, termination, contractual matters, or other issues, do not hesitate to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Fill out our online form or call us at 215-574-0600. Located in Philadelphia, we provide skilled counsel to clients throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Employment
  Comments: Comments Off on Employers Face Legal Questions During Coronavirus Outbreak
  Other posts by

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Considers Validity of Noncompete Agreements

By ,

Are restrictive covenants enforceable regardless of when they are signed? The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has heard argument on this question in Rullex Co. v. Tel-Stream. Existing case law does not clarify whether restrictive covenants are enforceable if they are executed after the parties start working together.

Rullex is a telecommunications construction company and Tel-Stream is a subcontractor that provides labor crews to businesses that service cellular towers. Rullex filed its lawsuit against Tel-Stream alleging that Tel-Stream breached the restrictive covenant by doing work for a competitor of Rullex. The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas ruled in favor of Tel-Stream and rejected Rullex’s  petition for injunctive relief. Rullex appealed the ruling but the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court, holding that the noncompete agreement was not enforceable because it was executed after Tel-Stream had been hired and was already working on projects. Rullex then appealed to the highest court in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

In its latest appeal, Rullex asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to change the current law  that requires a non-compete clause to be executed at or before an employee or contractor begins working, and if it was signed later, the courts would not enforce it. Under the new law that Rullex has asked the Supreme Court to adopt, if  a company merely advised the employee or contractor that some time in the future it would require a signed non-compete agreement, and if in the future, long after the employee or contractor had been working on the job it did sign the non-compete agreement, the company would be able to enforce it.

Gary Green of Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C., who represents Tel-Stream, fought the request for the Supreme Court to make a new rule and argued to the Court  that based on the evidence and record made in the lower courts before the case reached the Supreme Court, there was no agreement by Tel-Stream when it began to do its work for Rullex that at some future date, Rullex would be able to demand that Tel-Stream be bound by a non-compete clause.  Mr. Green contended therefore  that there was no enforceable agreement for any restrictive covenant.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Provide Skilled Representation in Matters Regarding Restrictive Covenants

If you have questions about the legality of restrictive covenants in your employment contract, contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. today. Call us at 215-574-0600 or fill out our contact form to schedule an initial consultation. We provide skilled representation to clients throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey from our Philadelphia office.

Speaking Out on Climate Change Could Get Amazon Employees Fired

By ,

Amazon employees are speaking out against the online retail giant, criticizing the company for its business practices, including the company’s expansion of its business with major oil and gas companies and the impact it has on the environment. After at least two employees spoke publicly about their opinions, saying that Amazon should be more proactive when it comes to climate change, the workers received written warnings from their employer saying that they could be fired for violating the company’s communications policy. In response to this threat, hundreds of Amazon employees are banding together to criticize the company and support their fellow employees, even if it means losing their job.

Amazon’s communications policy prohibits employees from speaking about the company without prior authorization. The Amazon activists, also known as Amazon Employees for Climate Change, sent an email to thousands of colleagues, asking them to share their thoughts about Amazon’s practices, including issues related to sustainability, immigration, and working conditions in warehouses. The organizers plan to make the comments public once they have gathered at least 100 responses. They believe that strength in numbers will make it more difficult for Amazon to punish a large group of dissenters as opposed to two or three outspoken employees.

Amazon Spokesperson Stands by Company Policy

When asked about the employees’ efforts to organize and speak out against the company, a spokesperson from Amazon said that employees are welcome to discuss a range of topics about the company, including sustainability and other environmental issues with fellow employees and team members. However, the external communications policy states that employees may not speak to the media about the company unless they have approval. An updated version of the policy, which was made after Amazon employees announced their climate protest, said that employees would need to request approval to speak to the media, and they would need to provide a business justification for their request.

One employee was called into a meeting with human resources after she commented on Amazon’s business with oil and energy companies for a story in The Washington Post. She was told that if she spoke to the media again, she could lose her job. She said that she spoke up because she is genuinely scared about the climate crisis, and she will continue to speak up until things start to change.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Advocate for Employees’ Rights

The Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. understand the complex relationship between a company like Amazon and its employees. We work closely with employees who choose to speak out against a company for any wrongdoing. To schedule an initial consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Located in Philadelphia, we serve clients throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Employment Law
  Comments: Comments Off on Speaking Out on Climate Change Could Get Amazon Employees Fired
  Other posts by

Changes to Employment Law for 2020

By ,

Effective January 1, 2020, over two dozen federal and state employment laws went into effect, which will have an impact on issues involving salaries, employment reclassifications, drug testing, accommodations for pregnant and nursing mothers, and family and medical leave. Employers will need to ensure that they are following these updated laws. The following is an overview of the changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the changes to employment law in New Jersey.

FLSA Overtime Amendments

● The minimum annual salary for most exempt employees increased to $35,568 per year. For the roughly 1.3 million workers in this country who fall into this group, this is the first time that the salary threshold has been raised in over 15 years. Many workers believe that the increase is still insufficient.
● Employers may count non-discretionary bonuses and incentive payments to meet up to 10 percent of the standard salary level test. However, only employers who are paid annually or more frequently are eligible.
● The minimum annual salary for highly compensated employees increases from $100,000 to $107,432.
● All new hires must fill out the redesigned IRS Form W-4.

New Jersey Salary History Ban Law

In the Garden State, employers may no longer ask job candidates about their salary history, which includes inquiring about wages and benefits. The goal in preventing companies from making offers to prospective employees based on past salaries, or refraining from making an offer, is to promote pay equality among men, women, and minorities in New Jersey. According to the National Partnership for Women and Families, women in New Jersey are paid 82 cents for every $1 earned by men. State employers had to comply with a salary history ban since 2018. The updated law now includes private employers as well. Employers who do not comply with this new law will face penalties of up to $1,000 for their first offense, $5,000 for a second offense, and $10,000 for additional violations.

Philadelphia Employment Lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. Represent Workers Whose Employers Violated New Employment Law Changes

If your employer is not in compliance with the new employment laws, you are urged to contact the Philadelphia employment lawyers at Sidkoff, Pincus & Green P.C. as soon as possible. It is your employer’s responsibility to understand and comply with the new laws. Our skilled legal team will protect your rights and secure the financial compensation you deserve. To schedule an initial consultation, call us today at 215-574-0600 or contact us online. Located in Philadelphia, we serve clients throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

  Category: Employment Law
  Comments: Comments Off on Changes to Employment Law for 2020
  Other posts by